Which method pairs well with structured interviews according to Dobash and Dobash's research?

The pairing of structured interviews with unstructured interviews, as suggested by Dobash and Dobash's research, is rooted in the complementary strengths of the two methods. Structured interviews provide a systematic approach to collecting data, ensuring consistency and comparability across respondents. They allow researchers to obtain quantifiable information that can reveal patterns and correlations. However, this method can limit the depth of responses, as it may not allow participants to elaborate on their feelings or unique experiences.

On the other hand, unstructured interviews are more flexible and open-ended, enabling participants to express their thoughts and views in greater detail. This depth can enrich the data obtained from structured interviews by providing context and personal narratives that highlight individual experiences. By utilizing both methods, researchers can achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, combining the reliability of structured data with the richness of qualitative insights. Hence, this combination can lead to a fuller, more nuanced understanding of the research topic.