What should avoid to minimize the imposition problem in research?

To minimize the imposition problem in research, using clear and neutral language is crucial because it helps ensure that the participants fully understand the questions and concepts being presented to them without any inherent bias. Clear language facilitates better communication and allows respondents to express their true thoughts and feelings, rather than those influenced by the way questions are framed or interpreted. Neutral language also helps to avoid leading respondents to a particular answer, which could compromise the integrity of the data collected.

In contrast, employing complex terminology may confuse participants and lead to misinterpretations of the questions, thus increasing the imposition problem. Asking leading questions directly influences respondents toward a particular answer, undermining the goal of obtaining their authentic viewpoints. Using a biased sample would skew the results of a study and does not address or minimize imposition; instead, it creates a non-representative dataset that fails to capture the true diversity of opinions or experiences in the population being studied. Therefore, clear and neutral language is the optimal choice to reduce the imposition problem and enhance the validity of the research findings.